In our last article, we talked about the evident return of bank credit appetite in the Agriculture sector, a welcome development for farmers as capital availability is important for both increasing productivity and confidence in the sector. Both are good things, and they encourage further investment plus ensure that talent is attracted to the sector, critical for future success.
In this article, Scott Wishart and I came together to collaborate on a new article to broaden the discussion and talk about the observed credit cycle in agriculture – what causes it and what to look for.
This is important to understand as these cycles are much shorter than the investment period of a farming business. In other words, it’s not uncommon to see less than 3-5 years from peak to the trough of a credit cycle - yet the investment in farming is generational and needs to outlive both the top and the bottom of these peaks.
The causes are not always the same either. Sometimes it’s due to the lack of sustained profitability in the sector, other times it might be a generalised credit crunch. Sometimes like we saw in 2016 onwards, it was increased regulatory capital requirements making agriculture loans less profitable.
In other times it’s sector weighting versus other sectors in that bank, or even at the parent bank. An example of this that we’re seeing playing out right now is where one sector (housing) is becoming “full” for the bank and where another sector (agriculture) has loans that are getting repaid faster than they are growing creating a positive supply gap of credit.
Learning how to spot the early signs of change and what drives these changes is critical when making your investment decisions. Sticking to rigorous behaviours with business management and decisioning is key.
The cycle can be best represented by a sine wave as follows:
The Bottom
Starting at the bottom of the credit cycle, this is where we have the least amount of credit appetite amongst the banks. We last saw the very bottom of this in 2015 to 2016, although it lasted a lot longer this time going right through to about 2018 before we saw some green shoots. We saw another period like this post GFC, although it didn’t last as long.
Things that were evident during the bottom of the credit cycle:
The Top
Conversely, at the top of the cycle, we see much different behaviours in the market
The top of the cycle is something we observed at a couple of different points – 2013/14 was a large peak and so was 2006-2008. Both were driven by record pay-outs at the time, but interestingly were preceded by significant credit growth, not retraction, as we have seen over the last few years.
Being at the top or the bottom is one thing but being ahead of the curve is probably more important, so working out what’s going on before anyone else is a useful thing to know.
Here are some of the "canaries in the coalmine"
If we’re at the bottom, but trending upwards, these are the signs of the first green shoots:
We’re at the top, but trending downwards
When things turn for the worse they can turn quite quickly, so have a look out for these early warning signs:
So where are we now?
I don’t think we are at the top of the cycle yet and importantly, we don't believe the peak will look like it was last time, but we are climbing towards it. Most of the observations about the top of the cycle are starting to play out in the market, albeit at levels seen below prior peaks.
The settings now have the right level of tension in them – with enough market competition and enthusiasm for sensible lending choices.
But whilst the wave is likely to be less peaky this time, it will still be a wave.
So What?
As sure as night follows day, the credit cycle will again fall the other way. We’ve seen it before in agriculture and we’re currently seeing it in housing.
Whether it be up or down, you can quite quickly see how a bank’s view of the world starts to become your own. If you let this occur, it may cut short your full potential at the bottom of the credit cycle or suffer the consequences of extending yourself too far at the top.
It's not wise to rely solely on your bank’s own parameters or enthusiasm (high or low) for executing your investment decision, as they are representative of, and biased towards the lending appetite it currently has or hasn’t got.
Ensuring that your business is set up for both growth and sustainability to meet a range of criteria is critical- not just those at the top nor bottom of the cycle. This includes making sure your business is strong enough to meet multiple lenders criteria at different levels and have necessary buffers in your system, whether it be stress testing your investment decisions, having plenty of cash reserves or having significant unused facility headroom.
That way you’ll never be forced to make decisions in your business that will ultimately hurt your business.
When you keep your business in a shape for all seasons, you’ll find that banks will generally be competing for your business, whatever the market and you’ll enjoy the best interest rates and conditions the market can offer.
Andrew & Scott
Farming’s very complex and you can’t be an expert in everything. That’s why the best farmers gather a specialist team around them. Our specialty is better banking outcomes for our clients.
There’s no one better to work alongside you and your bank. With a deep understanding of your operation and our considerable banking expertise, we can give you the confidence and control to do what you do best.
We’ve been operating for over five years now and we’re right across New Zealand, For an introductory no cost chat, pick up the phone and talk directly to one of our specialists on 0800 NZAB 12.
Or if you prefer, Visit us at our website or email us directly on info@nzab.co.nz